Sept 24, 2007

- APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE A JUDGE to address the liability in file # 182787-1
On the solid ground THAT under Sec 8 CCC - I have been subjected to a wrongful and unlawful arrest

Marc Boyer, is acting under a Sec 337 CCC demand to force the delivery of file # 157481 to me ex parte,

1. On the grounds of belief THAT: The Crown stayed proceeding on this file last Sept 28th, 2006,
2. in order to avoid a challenge to show that they held jurisdiction on the matter before them, and
3. after the Crown refused to deliver this file, [3-X at this session], I was told by the judge to file for it,

4. In accordance to law and order, the Crown has 1-year to act on this file, and as to this undertaking
   I demand the Crown to deliver this file, in the event that they fail to act on proceeding on this file.
5. THEREFORE: Since nonfeasance means compliance then the Crown must surrender the file to me,

BUT the Crown seems to be under some retraining order to preclude communication with me, and

1. due to an urgency to possess this file prior to my October 5th appearance on file #  182787-1
5. I hereby demand, under Sec 337 to deliver this file to me, at or before at this court date ex parte.

7. This is necessary, because Ms Bagnal made it clear that she recognizes a perverted grounds for her present ruling; NAMELY: Ms Bruce’s Reasons for Sentencing, in file # 157479-C-3 which is co-joined to file # 1574781, and as outlined in court in self-defense, I must now proceed criminally.
8. On the solid ground THAT:  By charging Ms Bruce prior to sentencing, I may avoid getting fucked
9. FUCK [old English law] When judges rape any loyal Subject of his lawful right to hold no jurisdiction

NOTICE OF LIABILITY: Let it be clearly understood that since this file is co-joined to file # 157479-C-3, and

1. Due to this ‘nature’ that this means my jurisdiction issue on all of these 3 file are in estoppel, and
2. THEREFORE: in order to seek remedy through any lawful means under Sec 11-D of the Charter,
3. Under Sec 337, I hereby DEMAND THAT: a public tribunal must be called on the understanding THAT:   the liability contained in these files and my Elections Canada file(s) are nothing but, an insult to the courts and subvert Democracy itself, and nothing but a tribunal will restore the public trust
4. On the  solid ground THAT: The very purpose of a tribunal is to protect the form from this perversion

  In order to seek remedy, and present an opportunity to start a make-over quickly, this court can recognize
THAT they cannot proceed on this file without first addressing the liability created by Judge Bruce’s ruling

COUNT # 1     On, or about Dec 5th 2005, In the City of Vancouver, at 222 Main Street, in Room 307 
Ms Bruce did commit the offense of CRIMINAL BREACH OF FIDUCIARY TRUST - Sec 336 CCC,
by willfully refusing to recognize Sec 133 of the BNA Act’s definition of the rule of law as Supreme,
[which was upheld in her written Reason for Sentencing, and confirmed in her written Conclusion]

COUNT # 2     On, or about Dec 5th 2005, In the City of Vancouver, at 222 Main Street, in Room 307 
Ms Bruce did commit the offense of FAILURE TO DELIVER PROPERTY – Sec 337 CCC
A] - By refusing to recognize jurisdiction or remedy under the Elections Act, by declaring in her ruling THAT:
“I was mis’taken’ [raped] for believing that the Elections Act offered me immunity” [not its protection]
AND this offense is aggravated by the fact THAT:  Her ruling was handed down after the Writ was dropped,
-    Which means this omission constitutes legal insanity [DCL] by ruling that the Elections Act did not apply.

RECOGNIZING TO PROCEED ON THESE INDICTMENTS, at this court appearance will start a make-over   
1]  This is due to the liability created by this ruling, which starts with Ms. Michelle Jean: who refused to uphold her trust to hold the Office of the Governor General of Canada; therefore facing one count to willfully commit the heinous offense of CRIMINAL BREACH OF FIDUCIARY TRUST – Sec 336 CCC, by refusing to act, while the Writ was dropped, when she held the power and fiduciary duty to act, therefore subjecting Her Office with the shame of subverting Democracy itself, under Her Office’s watch
2]  Due to this nonfeasance and in complicity with the Chief Electoral Officer Jean Pierre Kingsley, and both Officers of the Justice Minister, MUST also face one count of violating Sec 336 and 337 CCC for allowing the vacation in the Offices, on or about Dec 21st 2006, to avoid addressing answering my demand to define, in writing, which rule of law is Supreme in their Office, and these charges transfer onto the pervert Prime Minister Steven Harper for FRAUD for common theft of my identity and TREASON for ignorance for the law for upholding that the Charter lets him destroy our 1867 Constitution, in order to subvert Democracy itself.